{"presentation":{"slides":[{"elements":[{"x":25.05446623093682,"y":25.806451612903224,"width":49.01960784313726,"height":21.50537634408602,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

Considering EDI in Metrics for Research Excellence<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"c55906d1-41da-4cab-a07f-eefee96e68eb","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""},{"x":14.161220043572985,"y":64.51612903225806,"width":70.80610021786492,"height":12.903225806451612,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

Click through the slides below for some key considerations for embedding equity, diversity, and inclusion into your metrics of research excellence.<\/span><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"74a29729-785e-424e-8634-c29605bd45f9","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}},{"slideBackgroundSelector":{},"elements":[{"x":3.2679738562091507,"y":8.588709677419356,"width":93.68191721132898,"height":81.72043010752688,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

Avoid overreliance on bibliometrics in evaluating research impact.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n

As discussed in earlier modules, there are many factors that inhibit scholars from equity-deserving groups from disseminating their findings in peer-academic settings and from having their work cited widely. Biases among peer reviewers ensure that new works cite traditional canons and scholars situated in North American and European universities. All of these factors accumulate as discrepancies within citation indices.<\/span><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"3704d1fc-18f7-42bc-b946-924544d5c6a2","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}]},{"elements":[{"x":4.357298474945534,"y":10.739247311827956,"width":88.23529411764706,"height":66.66666666666666,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

Use qualitative and quantitative evaluations of research quality.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n

Avoid relying too heavily on either qualitative or quantitative evaluations of research quality. Assess both when considering the research impact of an individual scholar\u2019s body of work. Assess research on its own merits rather than exclusively on the journal the research was published in.<\/span><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"90001347-6b0c-405a-a77a-4cd59a0d88dc","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}},{"elements":[{"x":3.2679738562091507,"y":8.588709677419356,"width":91.50326797385621,"height":86.02150537634408,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

Protect excellence in locally relevant research.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n

Universalistic understandings of research excellence tend to undervalue research that is locally relevant or that depends on fostering sincere and respectful relationships with local communities. Consider how the impact of an individual scholar\u2019s body of work responds to diverse local needs and priorities in areas they work in. These may differ from the priorities of national or international research ecosystems.<\/span><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"65685f21-c713-493a-91ec-c990a00a5d09","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}},{"elements":[{"x":3.2679738562091507,"y":6.438172043010752,"width":92.5925925925926,"height":88.17204301075269,"action":{"library":"H5P.AdvancedText 1.1","params":{"text":"

Researchers have pluralistic understandings of research excellence.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n

As discussed earlier in this section, there is no universally accepted definition of excellent research within any given field. Views of research excellence are informed by the priorities of individual scholars, communities, departments, governments, and other organizations. As society changes, so do research priorities and understandings of research excellence. The needs and priorities of members of equity-deserving groups have not traditionally been made a priority by funding bodies within the Canadian research ecosystem, resulting in their needs not being met by existing research agendas.<\/span><\/p>\n"},"subContentId":"4805ccc5-0410-40a1-a8a8-ea0e2542e6b8","metadata":{"contentType":"Text","license":"U","title":"Untitled Text"}},"alwaysDisplayComments":false,"backgroundOpacity":0,"displayAsButton":false,"buttonSize":"big","goToSlideType":"specified","invisible":false,"solution":""}],"slideBackgroundSelector":{}}],"keywordListEnabled":true,"globalBackgroundSelector":{"fillGlobalBackground":"#ffffff"},"keywordListAlwaysShow":false,"keywordListAutoHide":false,"keywordListOpacity":90},"override":{"activeSurface":false,"hideSummarySlide":false,"summarySlideSolutionButton":true,"summarySlideRetryButton":true,"enablePrintButton":false,"social":{"showFacebookShare":false,"facebookShare":{"url":"@currentpageurl","quote":"I scored @score out of @maxScore on a task at @currentpageurl."},"showTwitterShare":false,"twitterShare":{"statement":"I scored @score out of @maxScore on a task at @currentpageurl.","url":"@currentpageurl","hashtags":"h5p, course"},"showGoogleShare":false,"googleShareUrl":"@currentpageurl"}},"l10n":{"slide":"Slide","score":"Score","yourScore":"Your Score","maxScore":"Max Score","total":"Total","totalScore":"Total Score","showSolutions":"Show solutions","retry":"Retry","exportAnswers":"Export text","hideKeywords":"Hide sidebar navigation menu","showKeywords":"Show sidebar navigation menu","fullscreen":"Fullscreen","exitFullscreen":"Exit fullscreen","prevSlide":"Previous slide","nextSlide":"Next slide","currentSlide":"Current slide","lastSlide":"Last slide","solutionModeTitle":"Exit solution mode","solutionModeText":"Solution Mode","summaryMultipleTaskText":"Multiple tasks","scoreMessage":"You achieved:","shareFacebook":"Share on Facebook","shareTwitter":"Share on Twitter","shareGoogle":"Share on Google+","summary":"Summary","solutionsButtonTitle":"Show comments","printTitle":"Print","printIngress":"How would you like to print this presentation?","printAllSlides":"Print all slides","printCurrentSlide":"Print current slide","noTitle":"No title","accessibilitySlideNavigationExplanation":"Use left and right arrow to change slide in that direction whenever canvas is selected.","accessibilityCanvasLabel":"Presentation canvas. Use left and right arrow to move between slides.","containsNotCompleted":"@slideName contains not completed interaction","containsCompleted":"@slideName contains completed interaction","slideCount":"Slide @index of @total","containsOnlyCorrect":"@slideName only has correct answers","containsIncorrectAnswers":"@slideName has incorrect answers","shareResult":"Share Result","accessibilityTotalScore":"You got @score of @maxScore points in total","accessibilityEnteredFullscreen":"Entered fullscreen","accessibilityExitedFullscreen":"Exited fullscreen"}}

APC - EDI and Research Excellence - Considerations

Brief Introduction

Heena Mistry